co2 Help - Page 3

McGruppsMonsters · #21 10-03-2008, 12:11 AM

I am just going to use the regulator because of the heat issues associated with burning the gas though I weighed both options.

It appears the regulator is going to cost me about $150, and the tank $230, filled... and I will need to fill that bitch up once a week - not exactly a cheap investment but I think i'll get an extra boost to more than pay that off in a single cycle.

$380 to get started without a c02 controller. With the c02 controller I'm looking at more like $880....really starting to think I should just find a friend who will lend me $500 to get the brain so I know it's being done effectly.

The c02 calculators online tell me it will take 26 minutes to fill my room to 1500PPM of c02. I would then try to leave the lights off for as long as I could to let it absord before putting exhaust back on. I figured this made sense, right?

My other friend told me ideally you want the 1500PPM to be constant... which is basicly what the brain would do for you. If the temps in room go up too much, c02 is cut...exhaust on. If not enough c02 in the air, exhaust off, c02 on. It sounds wonderful to be able to have a great efficient way to run the c02 but I'm not 100% sure I can afford the 500 bucks for a controller right now.

Like I said, my friend said he would be willing to come over with the brain..hook it up and leave it there for a few hours so I can get a grasp of how quickly the c02 is leaving the room when the exhaust fires back up, and I can mathmatically try to figure out the optimal poor man's version of c02.

Would fillng the room for a half hour every hour and then letting them absorb the c02 with the exhaust off, and then bam put the exhaust fan back on. Would this work?

From what I understand from him the room needs to stay more constant than like that. I know people out there use c02 methods without the expensive controller, I'm curious how you approached it.

You could use those analog timers to do 15 minute stints, but those sometimes aren't too accurate, especially if you loser power for any small amount of time.

My room is sealed for the most part, there's bent wood from the door being a bit weathered from a few years of growing in here, but I put a foam strip along the door in all places I could.

Thanks again everyone, keep this conversation open. I'm trying to figure out if I can do this WITHOUT the c02 controller for the first run through, and buying one later on... or if I'm just gonna waste my time using the c02 calculations online and combine that data with what I get from my boy's controller.

McGruppsMonsters · #22 10-03-2008, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DR. VonDankenstine

Most regulators have a SCFH-setting. For your size room I would just set it to 1.5scfh and have it kick off when you run your fans---you only need to run it an hour after lights on and turn off an hour before lights out.------I would recommend sealing the room and running passive light cooling then you don't have to vent your room during the lights on period and you run your exhaust during the lights out which is even better because you will lower your humidity at night. Spent the money and get an co2 controller-------DO NOT GET THE CAP PPM4----HPS BALLIST NOISE WILL FREEZE THE UNIT UP ALL THE TIME. CAP doesn't care and will not replace or back the units once you purchase them.

I'm either not understanding what you are talking, or don't think it would work... can't figure out which.

If we only air cooled our lights while the co2 was on, sure that would help with temps...I'm guessing that's why you would do that. As for only exhausting when the lights are out, well my room is gonna get just too damn hot if that's what i did. Maybe I'm confused about something you are trying to explain.

Here is what I know
-my room is 960 cubic feet.
-when I run my co2 I want the exhaust off so I can fill my room with 1500PPM of c02.
-the calculator told me it would take 23 minutes to do.

Questions about where to go from here:
-the exhaust should be left off for a little while AFTER you let the gas out so they can absorb it well. I figured maybe 10 minutes?
-by the end of that 10 minutes I'm guessing my c02 levels would decrease as plants absorb it, and then when I kick the fans back on obviously most of the c02 will be shot out of the room.
-at that point I would assume our c02 level would think be back to our atmosphere;s level...right around 300...maybe a bit higher.
-I would repeat the same prcoess twelve times while lights are on.

This would mean they received c02 for the 26 minutes the pump was on, and then when c02 turns off we likely hit our 1500 pppm. the ladies then get to enjoy the rays, sway in the wind, and perhaps eat some icecream for the next ten minutes while the c02 is no longer on, and neither is exhaust. They simply sit back, relax, and enjoy the goodies I'm giving them.

Now after that, my fans come back on and clear the c02 outta the air almost immediately I would guess. So we just had 36 minutes of out the hour that they were receiving gas with no interuptions from ventlation. I would then ventilate for 24 minutes...and start cycle over.

It seems like it could work just fine but my c02 LEVELS won't be held around 1500. I still have to think they would benefit from the 36 minutes of c02 enriched air rather than getting only what they get from the atmosphere.

Any and all help is really appreciated.. you guys are helpin. Sorry if I seem like a noob with c02, but I AM!!!

I'm sure its worth the frustration trying to figure out how to do it, and also the money... in the end I should notice a nice difference in yield.

DR. VonDankenstine · #23 10-03-2008, 01:13 AM

You are over-thinking it!!!---keep it simple. Why is your room so hot when your lights are out?????----What kind of light system are you using? Did you know that your temps should be higher when using co2? like 83-85...Did you know that they make a water cooled co2 generator that can run off propane or natural gas. There are good ways to go about using co2----one of the worst ways is blowing it out your exhaust. Sometimes you have to rethink your room but in the long run if your going to run bottled co2 it's a needed. I've helped someone who Had a 1440 CF room and when it was all said and done his was burning a 20 pound tank every 8 days.(that's great for that size room).----sealed room/passive lights/fuzzy logic controller and no venting during co2 enrichment hours(10hrs@1500). Also your co2 ppm's should match your nutr ppm's @83deg for optimal absorption.

DR. VonDankenstine · #24 10-03-2008, 01:17 AM

If everything is perfect------air/light/co2/temps/medium/water/air around plants/plants health, you could get a 20% gain. I would count on getting about 10% gains over not using the juice.

DR. VonDankenstine · #25 10-03-2008, 01:23 AM

#1

08-13-2008, 02:18 AM

DR. VonDankenstine

Stoner
Mr. Ganja

Join Date: May 2008
Location: humbolt
Posts: 1,051
Gallery:

*** water cooled co2 generator ***
permalink
HydroGEN Water Cooled CO2 Generator

The HydroGEN is the world's first and only water cooled CO2 generator. Water cooling is capable of removing 86% of the heat produced by burning propane and has loads of other options and features not available in any other CO2 generator on the market, including a completely adjustable flame (can produce anywhere between 15 and 45 cubic feet of CO2 per hr), an adjustable water flow valve, no pilot light (flame is activated by water flow), a tipover cut off, an overheat shut down sensor, and the list goes on. The unit can easily be used in a closed-loop system with a small chiller and reservoir, or you can connect directly to your home water supply and drain to storage for reuse in your garden. The unit is compact in size and can be either hung or wall-mounted anywhere in your garden.
***Coming soon the "MiniGEN" water-cooled CO2 generator, designed for smaller enclosures***

bonghits4all · #26 10-03-2008, 01:55 AM

i will most deff. get flamed for my suggestion but the cheapest way to fill your room with c02 without getting tecnical is to fill up a gallon jug with water sugar and yeast. and let it ferment for two weeks in your grow room 4 jugs in a room your size will get it done.every two weeks refill the jugs.laugh if you want but it works.And its allmost impossible to over do it.it smells kinda like beer in your grow room but its easy to adjust to. and no need to adjust venting timer cause for the 12 hrs the lights and vents are off your plants are absorbing the c02 un interrupted.yes they get less c02 from the jugs but they get it for a verry extended period of time.i ve said my peace so fire away

unity · #27 10-03-2008, 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DR. VonDankenstine

Most regulators have a SCFH-setting. For your size room I would just set it to 1.5scfh and have it kick off when you run your fans---you only need to run it an hour after lights on and turn off an hour before lights out.------I would recommend sealing the room and running passive light cooling then you don't have to vent your room during the lights on period and you run your exhaust during the lights out which is even better because you will lower your humidity at night. Spent the money and get an co2 controller-------DO NOT GET THE CAP PPM4----HPS BALLIST NOISE WILL FREEZE THE UNIT UP ALL THE TIME. CAP doesn't care and will not replace or back the units once you purchase them.

Agreed! The units are shit! But the counter works. CAP replaced mine no questions asked, but the 'new' rebuild one they gave me is shit as well.lol.
Dr. You are being kind to the CAP unit when you say the ballast freezes them up

, since I have a digi balast that is outside my grow. I think the unit has serious program issues.

unity · #28 10-03-2008, 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McGruppsMonsters

I'm either not understanding what you are talking, or don't think it would work... can't figure out which.

If we only air cooled our lights while the co2 was on, sure that would help with temps...I'm guessing that's why you would do that. As for only exhausting when the lights are out, well my room is gonna get just too damn hot if that's what i did. Maybe I'm confused about something you are trying to explain.

Here is what I know
-my room is 960 cubic feet.
-when I run my co2 I want the exhaust off so I can fill my room with 1500PPM of c02.
-the calculator told me it would take 23 minutes to do.

Questions about where to go from here:
-the exhaust should be left off for a little while AFTER you let the gas out so they can absorb it well. I figured maybe 10 minutes?
-by the end of that 10 minutes I'm guessing my c02 levels would decrease as plants absorb it, and then when I kick the fans back on obviously most of the c02 will be shot out of the room.
-at that point I would assume our c02 level would think be back to our atmosphere;s level...right around 300...maybe a bit higher.
-I would repeat the same prcoess twelve times while lights are on.

This would mean they received c02 for the 26 minutes the pump was on, and then when c02 turns off we likely hit our 1500 pppm. the ladies then get to enjoy the rays, sway in the wind, and perhaps eat some icecream for the next ten minutes while the c02 is no longer on, and neither is exhaust. They simply sit back, relax, and enjoy the goodies I'm giving them.

Now after that, my fans come back on and clear the c02 outta the air almost immediately I would guess. So we just had 36 minutes of out the hour that they were receiving gas with no interuptions from ventlation. I would then ventilate for 24 minutes...and start cycle over.
I don't think that is sufficient.

It seems like it could work just fine but my c02 LEVELS won't be held around 1500. I still have to think they would benefit from the 36 minutes of c02 enriched air rather than getting only what they get from the atmosphere.
You are shooting in the dark without the counter, imagine someone getting meds through a drip without a counter

Any and all help is really appreciated.. you guys are helpin. Sorry if I seem like a noob with c02, but I AM!!!

I'm sure its worth the frustration trying to figure out how to do it, and also the money... in the end I should notice a nice difference in yield.
The difference will be in bud quality, not yield The nugs are tight

You WILL need AC mate!!! to run co2 efficiently

I tried sooooo hard building a new space as efficiently as possible. I mean cool tube, insulation on the outside of the light etc. Man my light cools so well my hand doesn't even get warm when I leave it on the glass. NO CHANCE, the radiation heat just builds up in the space. I fought the ac for a long time but now I would NEVER go back! Not in my climate at least ( SoCal)

Here is something to think about. My best bud has and identical grow size as mine (3x3x7) except no ac and he vents (4" 100cfm) continuously. In order to maintain co2 levels at 1400ppm he has to have the regulator set at 1.7 the entire lights on time! That means a refill every 5 days. My space is sealed with ac and I need a refill every 3-4 weeks. I pay 20-30 bucks a month he pays 80-100 bucks. Keep in mind my plants have a perfect enviro with ac, his plants get hot as hell. Ley's not even start on humidity without ac....

Listen, the reason I brought up the CAP re-builds is that the counter works great on them and the rest you can adjust with the regulator. Only 200 bucks. That's what I do right now. It's no big deal, mine runs on a constant on .3 setting. You check it once a day to make sure it stays within your set range and that's it. I like it almost better, cause I am not worried anymore about killing my plants with an over or under dose,lol!

Another point to consider: The AC costs me under $30 a month and it eliminates the need for additional venting during lights on. I save $80 from the sealed room (co2 refills). IT's a 'no brainer'!

Good luck!

What do you think Doc?

DR. VonDankenstine · #29 10-03-2008, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unity

You WILL need AC mate!!! to run co2 efficiently

I tried sooooo hard building a new space as efficiently as possible. I mean cool tube, insulation on the outside of the light etc. Man my light cools so well my hand doesn't even get warm when I leave it on the glass. NO CHANCE, the radiation heat just builds up in the space. I fought the ac for a long time but now I would NEVER go back! Not in my climate at least ( SoCal)

Here is something to think about. My best bud has and identical grow size as mine (3x3x7) except no ac and he vents (4" 100cfm) continuously. In order to maintain co2 levels at 1400ppm he has to have the regulator set at 1.7 the entire lights on time! That means a refill every 5 days. My space is sealed with ac and I need a refill every 3-4 weeks. I pay 20-30 bucks a month he pays 80-100 bucks. Keep in mind my plants have a perfect enviro with ac, his plants get hot as hell. Ley's not even start on humidity without ac....

Listen, the reason I brought up the CAP re-builds is that the counter works great on them and the rest you can adjust with the regulator. Only 200 bucks. That's what I do right now. It's no big deal, mine runs on a constant on .3 setting. You check it once a day to make sure it stays within your set range and that's it. I like it almost better, cause I am not worried anymore about killing my plants with an over or under dose,lol!

Another point to consider: The AC costs me under $30 a month and it eliminates the need for additional venting during lights on. I save $80 from the sealed room (co2 refills). IT's a 'no brainer'!

Good luck!

What do you think Doc?

Sounds great to me!!!---I run tanks in the summer and gas in the winter---I keep my temps around 83 when the juice is on.-----You must run a scrubber in your room if your using A/C and venting the heat to the outside otherwise your just dumping the dank smelling air outside for all to appreciate. I have a portable A/C unit but never use it(thought I was going too). It has a 4" exhaust hose that I rigged up with a small ozone generator and I wired a digital controller to kick the ozone on for 4mins before the A/C cycles, I have never really had the chance to test it out--been messing around with some really small cab grows. I like the idea of the water cooled generator. And the people I have talked to say they work well and give off very little heat.

DR. VonDankenstine · #30 10-03-2008, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unity

Agreed! The units are shit! But the counter works. CAP replaced mine no questions asked, but the 'new' rebuild one they gave me is shit as well.lol.
Dr. You are being kind to the CAP unit when you say the ballast freezes them up

, since I have a digi balast that is outside my grow. I think the unit has serious program issues.

A Lot of users of the ppm4 have experienced lockout and freeze---I was told by cap reps this was due to the frequency signal giving off of digital ballasts ---they also said the fuzzy logic model could do the same but less often. They wanted to charge me a 180 restocking fee plus the difference of the 2 models. Anyway they should at the least post the warning on all the controller boxes to let digital ballast owners know about the problem.