THEY CAN'T SEND 'GURU OF GANJA' TO JAIL, BUT FEDS WILL RETRY CASE
by Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer, (Source:San Francisco Chronicle)
writeNewsItems();


14 Apr 2007

California
-------
Federal prosecutors brushed off a judge's suggestion that they not retry a prominent marijuana advocate on cultivation charges and said Friday they would press ahead, even though he cannot be sent to prison if he is convicted.

Assistant U.S. Attorney George Bevan made the announcement at a hearing in San Francisco before U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, who presided over the first trial of 62-year-old Ed Rosenthal of Oakland. When Bevan said last month that the government intended to retry the self-described "guru of ganja," Breyer urged him to reconsider, suggesting that federal resources might be used more productively in prosecutions that result in imprisonment.

Bevan said Friday that prosecutors had reached their decision after a "thorough and careful review" and that the final word had come from Scott Schools, the interim U.S. attorney in San Francisco. When Breyer asked if Justice Department officials in Washington had been consulted, Bevan said he didn't know.

The retrial, scheduled to begin May 14, will be limited to the cultivation charges of which Rosenthal was convicted in 2003, verdicts that were overturned on appeal last year. Prosecutors have said they would not seek additional imprisonment for Rosenthal, beyond the one day in jail he has already served, if he were convicted again.

Rosenthal was arrested for growing marijuana that he said was intended for medical patients. After he won his appeal on grounds of juror misconduct, prosecutors secured a new federal grand jury indictment in October that included additional charges of tax evasion and moneylaundering related to his marijuana cultivation.

The new charges could have resulted in a prison sentence of 20 years, but Breyer dismissed them last month, saying they had been added vindictively in retaliation for Rosenthal's successful appeal and his public statements disputing the fairness of his trial.

Bevan said Friday that his office would not appeal Breyer's ruling.

After the hearing, defense lawyers criticized the retrial decision. But Rosenthal's response was: Bring it on.

"This isn't a criminal case. This is a political case," said Rosenthal, wearing a shiny green robe embroidered with images of marijuana leaves. "When I win this case, it's saying to the government, 'You have to stop harassing the medical ( marijuana ) dispensaries.' "

Defense lawyer Shari Greenberger said she would ask Breyer to order the government to reimburse Rosenthal for the time his lawyers spent getting the new charges dismissed. Virginia Resner, president of a group called Green Aid, which is raising money for Rosenthal's defense, said preparation for the new trial has already cost $180,000.

Rosenthal is an authority on marijuana cultivation. His latest book was "Why marijuana Should Be Legal."

His first trial was the first and most prominent of several federal prosecutions of growers who were providing cannabis under a 1996 state initiative that allowed patients to use the drug with a doctor's approval.

Breyer barred evidence about medical marijuana during the trial, saying it was irrelevant to a prosecution under federal drug laws. After a jury convicted Rosenthal of three counts, however, the judge imposed a token one-day sentence rather than the five years prescribed by federal guidelines. Breyer said Rosenthal had believed he was acting legally because the city of Oakland had designated him as an official in its medical marijuana distribution program.

A federal appeals court overturned the convictions last year, finding misconduct by a juror who consulted a lawyer during deliberations. The court also indicated that it would have rejected prosecutors' appeal of the one-day sentence even if it had upheld the convictions.

I can't see them sending him to jail.

This may actually be a good thing. As Ed himself said he believes he can win the case. If anything it brings the debate to the forefront of peoples minds again.

Ed is fighting for freedom, trying to win the first battle... take out the front line. He has to put himself forward, he's probably the only person that can.

There isn't a jury in California who would convict a medical user ... as long as the jury understood prior to deliberations that the case was indeed a medical use case.

Vi

__________________
Liberals are people that will believe anything twice.

they say he won't face any jail time.the prosecutor is not seeking any. the judge thinks it's silly. ed is ready and waiting. he is welcoming this trial. good media exposure and all. plus he knows he will win. again.

just one more case of wasted tax payers money.

Not a waste fd', we need this battle. Well the med' users do, I do too I suppose. Every battle you guys win is one step closer for guys like me.

this is really exciting. too bad something this comical could only happen out west. in the midwest area it would just be prison.