
08-30-2008, 06:19 AM
|
 |
Teaching How To Roll
Mr. Ganja
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,322
|
|
I have both the 30x jewelers loop and the 420 scope which is damn near the same exact thing you got a radio shack. I got them both thru ebay for dirt cheap. I actually use both of them. Sometimes the scope is just too sensative or my hands are too shaky.
|

08-30-2008, 08:20 AM
|
 |
Stoner
Stoner
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: right behind you !!
Posts: 887
|
|
so the jewelers loop works for you??
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boneman
I have both the 30x jewelers loop and the 420 scope which is damn near the same exact thing you got a radio shack. I got them both thru ebay for dirt cheap. I actually use both of them. Sometimes the scope is just too sensative or my hands are too shaky.
|
Do you know how long into flower I have to wait until I can see the trics? You are able to use the jewelers loop to see the trics? 
|

08-30-2008, 08:45 AM
|
 |
Stoner
Stoner
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 744
|
|
Loup works fine, I have a 120 year old tailors loup from eastern europe (30x, for counting threads in a stich) and I use that more often then the scope. The scope requires batteries, had plastic lenses, and will not last as long as a real peice of equipment. The loup works fine for checking tricomes and sex too.
I guess the hardest thing for me is the scope requires the buds to not be moving at all and i need to squish the lense right near the bud to see, the fans have to be off and shit because the slightest movement causes distortion. And because the image goes through multiple lenses it inverts, which means the scope is confusing to move around to get looks at different angles of things. This is unlike the true image in a loup which is simpler to get readings off of and requires no special technique.
|

08-30-2008, 09:10 AM
|
 |
Stoner
Stoner
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: right behind you !!
Posts: 887
|
|
Thanks alot
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedhabit
Loup works fine, I have a 120 year old tailors loup from eastern europe (30x, for counting threads in a stich) and I use that more often then the scope. The scope requires batteries, had plastic lenses, and will not last as long as a real peice of equipment. The loup works fine for checking tricomes and sex too.
I guess the hardest thing for me is the scope requires the buds to not be moving at all and i need to squish the lense right near the bud to see, the fans have to be off and shit because the slightest movement causes distortion. And because the image goes through multiple lenses it inverts, which means the scope is confusing to move around to get looks at different angles of things. This is unlike the true image in a loup which is simpler to get readings off of and requires no special technique.
|
But do you know How FAR into FLOWERING I have to be before I can see the trics ????
|

08-30-2008, 09:46 AM
|
 |
Stoner
Stoner
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 744
|
|
should see something in about 4 weeks, you dont start checking the color till your near your harvest date, indicated by your genetics.
|

08-30-2008, 11:42 AM
|
 |
Teaching How To Roll
Mr. Ganja
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,322
|
|
I'm 100% with speedhabit. I just didnt have the time to type all that when I originally responded. You'll see the trics no problem with either one and pretty early aswell. Way easier to see clear, milky and amber thru the scope, just tougher to manage the movement etc... the 30x jewlers loupe is easy and fast but you have to put your face and eyeball all up close.
|

08-30-2008, 11:42 AM
|
 |
Stoner
Stoner
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: right behind you !!
Posts: 887
|
|
I appreciate all the help
|
|
I bought both of the magnifiers mentioned here in this thread (radioshack Illuminated microscope60x to 100x) and ( the 30x jewelers loop) to be honest with all of you it seems that the jewelers loop is easier by far to see the leaves close up. It may be different when the trics. appear as they are probably smaller than anything I am looking at now ??? 
|

08-30-2008, 09:32 PM
|
 |
420 TIME
Stoner
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 577
|
|
When I use that scope from radio shack and try to see them "on the plant" I was way too shaky, So someone on this site said to just clip a little bitty snip off of the bud leaf and put it on a plate. Then it stays still and is much easier to see and steady the scope. I didn't like not being able to get close enough without mushing my buds, when I say little bitty, I mean little tiny edge. That way is easiest if you don't mind a clip or two. It took some practice but now I have no problem. I've seen some killer scopes like a usb scope someone bought and posted the site, It looked great, cost was 60 bucks delivered at this link you can see it PC scope
__________________
Good seed, dirt, light, water, what's the big deal?
|

09-06-2008, 06:21 PM
|
 |
Stoner
Stoner
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: right behind you !!
Posts: 887
|
|
don't know if you are all still on this thread
|
|
but if you are then please check out my grow
$toney Montana's Dutch Passion BLUEBERRY grow and yes constructive critsism is welcome as I always want to learn something new !!! Thanks
|

09-06-2008, 06:29 PM
|
|
Ganja Smoker
Pot Head
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: somewhere USA
Posts: 308
|
|
I bought that Radio Shack magnifier to trich check and had a Hell of a time trying to use it on the living plant. What I ended up doing was tearing a small piece of leaf closest to the buds off and setting it on a table then putting the lense on it to hold it in place. Worked wonders. Who knew there was so much juice in those babies. 
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Come Check out a new Poker Forum for the online poker community
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:23 AM.
Page generated in 0.14922 seconds with 13 queries
|