GHCC Care Center in Tucson was busted today

Originally Posted by Lucius Vorenus

I stepped into a TEmpe colelctive the other day and was blown away. Waiting room full, 100% operation as a Dispensary

Where the fuck have you been? Hello. The club model is awesome. Fuck dispensaries.

Originally Posted by Lucius Vorenus

I stepped into a TEmpe colelctive the other day and was blown away. Waiting room full, 100% operation as a Dispensary

A fellow patient told me she made a stop by Cannapassion? In PHX and said the wait was thirty minutes because it was so packed.

Originally Posted by Chronicseeker

Put simply:
There can be no transaction of value unless you are that specific patient's caregiver.
That is the real law ask any legit legal council.
Every other interpretation is considered Grey area and does not provide immunity from prosecution, read the back of your new card....

Patients can trade meds etc but cash cannot be transferred.

Suggesting monetary values to anyone who is not your documented patient is illegal.
Some municipalities are trying to require caregivers to register with the city in which they are growing, solely for oversight purposes.

Selling to a patient that is not yours is a no no, but it's small time and doubtfully will draw attention with the bigger fish in AZ. Just not recomended because the one day that "patient" is a cop, technically it won't matter if they give you a penny.

Be careful all and if your going to make posts that can but others in harms way, please learn the fact first.

Where in the law is this based? I am not challenging just wish to see the legal basis for this opinion other than the DA or a police municipalities interpretation. Just like the concentrate opinion, is this merely an unchallenged shit opinion from the DA? Where in the law does it specifically state this?

We also have to remember that the valley is hitting the summer drought. If you know what I mean.

Originally Posted by irieie

Where in the law is this based? I am not challenging just wish to see the legal basis for this opinion other than the DA or a police municipalities interpretation. Just like the concentrate opinion, is this merely an unchallenged shit opinion from the DA? Where in the law does it specifically state this?

You are exactly right, the DA used those words to a T, that is why any legal council would recommend what I stated. If you get into trouble due to mmj who do you answer to? People under the DA, who most likely interpret the law as such. This is why CFCC is still up and running with out issues. All of their patients are registered to a caregiver. I'm not saying you won't beat the case but it's a case none the less.

Originally Posted by Chronicseeker

You are exactly right, the DA used those words to a T, that is why any legal council would recommend what I stated. If you get into trouble due to mmj who do you answer to? People under the DA, who most likely interpret the law as such. This is why CFCC is still up and running with out issues. All of their patients are registered to a caregiver. I'm not saying you won't beat the case but it's a case none the less.

I am fucking sick of our laws being interpreted by the opposition who have zero legal authority to do so. I await these cases to go to trial and I hope the defendents don't plea out so we can get a real ruling or clarification on these issues from the only people who have the authority to do so, judges.

Originally Posted by irieie

I am fucking sick of our laws being interpreted by the opposition who have zero legal authority to do so. I await these cases to go to trial and I hope the defendents don't plea out so we can get a real ruling or clarification on these issues from the only people who have the authority to do so, judges.

I could not agree more, there needs to be some clarification of the written laws to the general public.
Or at least easy access to clearly defined laws...

Originally Posted by Chronicseeker

I could not agree more, there needs to be some clarification of the written laws to the general public.
Or at least easy access to clearly defined laws...

I think that more than anyone law enforcement needs a correct interpretation on these laws which they are using to harass Arizona citizens.