06-09-2008, 10:46 AM
|
 |
Super Stoner
Mr. Ganja
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North of mexico and south of Canada
Posts: 9,730
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViRedd
Of course the Republicans take lobby money. Both parties do. So what?
I've challenged you to this before, but to date, you've not come up with the answer ... Find one .... just ONE Democrat in the Senate or Congress that have voted in favor of new dam construction, refinery construction, exploratory drilling or atomic energy plants. If you can fine one, I'll be really surprised. If you can't find one, at least think of the poor little old lady living on Social Security in the North East next January who will be eating dog food in order to afford her heating oil. Because of your Democrat Party, she will have to make the choice between eating or freezing to death.
After all Med ... if we could save one life by drillng in Anwar, it would be worth it, no? 
Vi
</IMG>
|
It was already brought to your attention what a miniscule amount of oil is in Anwar and in the grand scheme of things it wouldn't make one ounce of difference. The reason they want to drill in anwar is they don't have to pay foriegners for the oil, they can keep all the money. Your analogy about the old lady says it all. for our government to let an old lady die from either lack of heat or food speaks volumnes about Capitalism. Anwar is about profit, pure and simple. I'll guarantee you the price of gas will not go down one red cent from drilling in Anwar. |