View Single Post
  #10  
Old 05-11-2008, 03:40 PM
nickfury510's Avatar
nickfury510 nickfury510 is offline
Veteran Smoker
Mr. Ganja
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: my home is in my head
Posts: 1,617
Gallery:
nickfury510 is a jewel in the roughnickfury510 is a jewel in the roughnickfury510 is a jewel in the roughnickfury510 is a jewel in the rough
Points: 4,617, Level: 10 Points: 4,617, Level: 10 Points: 4,617, Level: 10
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fierybong View Post
When you factor in the added cost of additional fixtures and the cost of electrical resistance through more lights and wires and likely added heat from all of that I bet you are really not coming out ahead with lower wattage lights - not to mention the extra space needed.
how do you figure....the 23w gives more energy per watt....period....thus more efficient.....you are better off with 2 23s than one 42....one 42w gives you 2800 lumens 2 23w give you 3200 lumens....thats 400 extra lumens for the 4 extra watss with the 2 23s....as far as heat and resistance and space......are you serious...these are cfls not HID...
__________________
"the more herb man smoke the more babylon fall" Robert Nesta Marley

Last edited by nickfury510; 05-11-2008 at 04:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 1.37875 seconds with 9 queries