Marijuana Growing - View Single Post - Climate Crisis Fraud -written by a man who shares the Nobel Prize with Al Gore

towlie · #**472** 03-13-2008, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by closet.cult

I'm sure I can expect towlie to break down that post sentence by fucking sentence. Resist, dude.

We are just sharing ideas here.

There’s no fucking way I could ignore the shit you say. My now favorite past time is to post my comment, then your delusional response.

Furthermore, I have already explained why I respond directly to each of your comments. Add this to the list of growing comments you have failed to comprehend. As usual (actually always) you have twisted my comments inside your head, and responded to a straw man argument. (As promised, I will demonstrate this below.) Without exception during this thread, I have posted your comment, then my response. This takes, what? 1-second? You have not responded to a single question honestly. I keep saying this, and yet you lack the courage to present your discussion honestly.

I said: “I keep telling you that I don’t think any legitimate science exists, but I’ll admit it if I see it.”

Then you said: “You believe the scientists who proclaim "Crisis! Crisis!".”

Lol. You kill me dude.

I said: “I keep telling you over and over that I could find 100 scientific studies in under 2-minutes, but none of them agree with what you’re saying. You keep saying over and over that there is legitimate science but have yet to back it. The fact that I have to explain this to you on post 372 only proves your absolute delusion.”

Then you said… I shit you not… You really responded with this: “I believe the more moderate scientists who see nearly all data of every 'scientific study' as being within the natural range of climate variability.”

Questions you are refusing to answer:
1) Do you admit that accepting the opinions of commentators, no matter how brilliant they may be, is historically unwise when in disagreement with the CONSENSUS of scientific of scientifically published data? If not can you site a single historical reference to the contrary, will you at least admit this? (And don’t go with tectonic plates. Let’s try something relevant.)

2) If you’re still going to claim that science is not advanced enough to model climates could you please explain why you’re citing references that deceitfully misquote the facts pertaining to them? If you’re going deny this will you please address the example I previously gave?

3) Furthermore if you’re still going to claim that science is not advanced enough to model climates… would you please cite a scientific reference supporting this? (You’re scientifically minded right?)

4) May I see your best scientific study please?

Answer: Do your own goddamn research.

5) You’re argument is reduced to saying that the scientists disagree, but when I point out the similarly weighted consensus on UFO’s, 6,000 y/o earth, 911 conspiracy, etc. You completely ignore it. Could you please respond?

6) I offered you 4 published and renowned climatological research centers. I said pick one, or pick any one you can find… you’re a scientifically minded person right??? And let’s perform a search and choose the first 3, 5, 7, returns and see what they say