Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
Lol, I agree. And it may seem like I have a problem with science and I do, lol. Science doesn't need to prove the existence of a bigfoot, but disprove it. Doing this increases knowledge of a particular subject, and that is what science is about, knowledge. Scientist aren't going to learn anything if they try and make other people prove their claims, because most claims can't be proven in any way shape or form then eyewitness reports.
Its just my opinion that science moves in the wrong direction on subjects such as the supernatural, ET's, UFo's and other such things.
|
That is incorrect. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. Also, logically and scientifically you don't prove a negative. You can only prove something exists - you can't prove something doesn't exist.
I recommend you read my brief defense of science.
Aliens
I am going to try to avoid posting on these threads unless asked or given the OK to do so. I am not here to rain on anyones parade.