Lol, I agree. And it may seem like I have a problem with science and I do, lol. Science doesn't need to prove the existence of a bigfoot, but disprove it. Doing this increases knowledge of a particular subject, and that is what science is about, knowledge. Scientist aren't going to learn anything if they try and make other people prove their claims, because most claims can't be proven in any way shape or form then eyewitness reports.

Its just my opinion that science moves in the wrong direction on subjects such as the supernatural, ET's, UFo's and other such things.