Quote:
Originally Posted by email468
The most famous piece of evidence for bigfoot is an admitted hoax and your first reaction is the guy who says it is a hoax is hoaxing that it was a hoax? yikes! i think you've summed up the conspiracy theory frame of mind rather well there. So why not turn that around and say - oh the only real bit of evidence that could have forced science to look at the bigfoot question again is the DNA found in the hair and that is the only bit of evidence that didn't work out right? Hmmmm. Sounds like the aliens are conspiring with the TV show to keep proof of bigfoot from reaching us!
|
Yes that was my first response to the claim...someone looking for their 5 minutes of fame...but after just seeing the way the guy walked and his demeanor.....I finally admitted defeat. What baffles me is that even after this claim there are still hundreds of people pouring over this video insisting that it is real. Now that's scary! Why is it so hard to believe that someone claiming to have done a hoax is lying?
I'm not saying that this guy is lying, but it is possible for this scenario to happen.
On another note...what do you make of the fingerprint guy's conclusion? I mean this guy looked at solid evidence in fingerprinting and came to the conclusion that this was a species of ape not yet discovered. He said he would stake his whole career on that. Is he full of shit too?