I think this is the key to this particular component of the discussion/debate (i.e., trich production female vs. male)....

"yes, i understand that males produce 'some' trics. and theTHC in them is just as potent as their female siblings of the same mother/father. they just hardly have any trics so they're not much good for a high."

what I mean is - has there been a factual and empirical measure that given the same care and attention, do males actually produce less trich density than females?

I'm not saying that what is being said is wrong or right - I just have not seen the data to support such a claim...and likely this is a function of everyone not having any interest in males and therefore not giving them "equal care and attention". And maybe that is appropriate, but this is leading back to the discussion relating to the purpose of trichs....dessication, antifungal/mircrobial and UVB protection - these are of eqaul importance to males and females...so trich production should not be markedly different ....UNLESS....the purpose of trich IS more important for seed production.

__________________
Ride hard, Ride long....git put away Wet each and every time....no holdin' Back.....enjoy the journey ...... cuz that's ALL there is! Walk on and walk tall folks!