Thread: Safer with bush as president?
View Single Post
  #18    
Old 07-03-2009, 10:50 PM
doobnVA's Avatar
doobnVA
Mr.Ganja
Mr. Ganja
doobnVA is offline 		 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,585
doobnVA is a splendid one to beholddoobnVA is a splendid one to beholddoobnVA is a splendid one to beholddoobnVA is a splendid one to beholddoobnVA is a splendid one to beholddoobnVA is a splendid one to beholddoobnVA is a splendid one to behold
Points: 7,529, Level: 12 Points: 7,529, Level: 12 Points: 7,529, Level: 12
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
permalink
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mcgician View Post
These guys would've hated ANYTHING Bush did. If he'd saved lives by sending in the air force to strategically bomb terrorists, they would say we're chicken shit and don't have the guts to take them on "fairly". If we sent in troops to kick their ass, well then we're "invaders" and we're contributing to the "occupation". Didn't Obama just bomb the hell out of some terrorists in Afghanistan? Gee, I wonder why they didn't say anything bad about that? Seriously, the liberal mind is so jaded with hypocrisy it's not even funny anymore.
You're right, because Bush was an idiot who never did anything good for our country.

Now, I'm not saying Obama is any better, just that Bush was an amazingly horrible president. Even the majority of republicans agree that he was quite possibly the worst president in the history of the United States.
Reply With Quote