06-10-2009, 03:08 PM
|
 |
Veteran Smoker
Mr. Ganja
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio ... got rid of the repukes:)
Posts: 2,144
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by what... huh?
Lol... So are you thinkin if the rebar gets hot it gets heavier? Because those 5 i-beams (which are larger than the wtc beams... Notice you dropped that argument) are BENT and FOLDED.
|
You only prove my point ... the metal is "BENT and FOLDED" ... yet the WTC came crashing straight down instead of the "bent and folded" metal that we should have seen in a building still standing. ... oh larger beams eh?
NOT
See how big and thick and how many beams there are in those buildings folks? Way more than in a bridge and far bigger ... so wrong again dummy.
No way on God's green earth can those steel beams come crashing down in seconds after burning for less than 2 hours NO WAY ... you have to be stupid to believe otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by what... huh?
I am not talking about WTC right now, so quit bringing it up. We will cross that bridge when we get to it (couldn't resist). I am talking about THAT accident, and the resulting damage to the i-beams on the bridge.
|
The damage to the bridge is believable ... but not the skyscrapers ... all that metal didn't get weaken by fire alone ... it had a lot of help to bring all that steel down ... that bridge had no where near the amount of metal in a skyscapers ... and there was no melting metal with the bridge like with the towers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by what... huh?
Now concede so
we can move on.
|
Okay I concede that I made you look stupid again
|