View Single Post
  #425    
Old 06-08-2009, 10:26 AM
NoDrama's Avatar
NoDrama
Mr.Ganja
Mr. Ganja
NoDrama is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: I come from the land of the ice and snow, From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
Posts: 4,714
NoDrama has a brilliant futureNoDrama has a brilliant futureNoDrama has a brilliant futureNoDrama has a brilliant futureNoDrama has a brilliant futureNoDrama has a brilliant futureNoDrama has a brilliant futureNoDrama has a brilliant futureNoDrama has a brilliant futureNoDrama has a brilliant futureNoDrama has a brilliant future
Points: 27,406, Level: 23 Points: 27,406, Level: 23 Points: 27,406, Level: 23
Activity: 2% Activity: 2% Activity: 2%
Quote:
Originally Posted by what... huh? View Post
There is fire involved. Heat and concussion. Either by electronic or conventional black powder. Shock, and heat, go boom. I would think a munitions expert such as yourself would know that...

You understand the difference between making a declarative statement and and interrogative one? I asked for someone to let me know something I was clearly unaware of. You make it out like I stated it wasn't possible. I asked. Let me demonstrate.

"Can someone tell me an ordinance that does not explode in an inferno?"
Question. Cannot be correct or incorrect.

"Hint: There is no fire involved"
Statement. An incorrect one.

Glad I could clear that up for you. So are you going with C4 or thermite?


You were correct and I concede the notion that fire alone will not do it... which was my original IMPLICIT assertion. I am big on intellectual honesty, and it was my misunderstanding that intense fire alone will do the trick.

However a jet ramming into it will.
So now your saying that there were explosives inside that were activated by a Jet hitting it with concussive force and the flames from the ensuing burn of the fuel? cuz if you are I'm not really sure what your arguing about, cuz basically your agreeing that the buildings were blown up.

FWIW It takes a big man to admit when he is wrong..+rep to you for that.

edit: I can't +rep you cuz i +repped you earlier on a different post, just imagine I gave it to you for now while I go find others worthy of praise.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Man o' the green View Post
Life, liberty and property as freedoms, not as entitlements.
 
Page generated in 1.07740 seconds with 9 queries