
05-31-2009, 11:21 AM
|
 |
Veteran Smoker
Mr. Ganja
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio ... got rid of the repukes:)
Posts: 2,144
|
|
Breaking news people ... big time
|
|
Folks there are a couple of groups that are working for a real investigation into 911 ... the people of NY city who have a legal right to force a real investigation
if you are from NYC please go and sign the petition for a real investigation.
... and a group of engineers and architects that have found evidence ... imagine my lack of surprise ... that those building came down with explosives. A local corporate own media station actually had an engineer on making the claim. The station was overwhelmed with thank you email for bring up the issue ... so much so they had to ask people to stop because it was interfering with getting other news. Check it out ...
Mainstream media outlet overwhelmed by "thank you" emails for interview questioning 9/11.
After a mainstream TV station in Fresno, California presented a "fair and balanced" interview with Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth (http://ae911truth.org), the public (no doubt in shock and awe that this presentation was not subjected to the usual mainstream media self-censorship on 9/11 anomalies and unanswered questions) has overwhelmed the station's email system with thank you emails.
UPDATE: from http://911Truth.org ;
PLEASE NOTE: Although supportive notes to the station are a kind thought, and many of us have now sent them, we have been asked by the KMPH Executive Producer to not send anymore. Apparently, they've been so overwhelmed with 'thank you notes' they're missing other important emails like press releases and news tips, necessary to the continuing excellent production of Great Day. We encourage you to mail a thank you, if you feel compelled to do so, to their street address: KMPH FOX 26, 5111 E. McKinley Ave., Fresno, CA 93727.
Groovy baby ...
Transcript of Richard Gage explaining controlled demolition on KMPH in Fresno
Is the dam beginning to break?
In this seven minute interview, Richard Gage, an architect for 20 years, is given plenty of time to explain the overwhelming evidence that the World Trade Center buildings were not brought down by the impact of the planes and ordinary office fires. Unlike the derision and condescension that typically greets 9/11 truth activists at mainstream outlets, these two anchors seem genuinely curious and open to the uncomfortable facts proving that explosives were detonated inside the Twin Towers.
Now, before everyone gets excited, remember that this is a FOX News Affiliate, so this broadcast was show only in Fresno, not nation-wide, and from the clock on screen, at 8:41 in the morning when viewership is very low.
This may be a "bone" tossed by FOX to the truth movement so that FOX can now claim to have covered 9-11 honestly and fairly in case things really unwrap down the road.WRH
Here's a longer video presentation from Mr. Gage ...
9/11 Blueprint for Truth presented by Architect Richard Gage, AIA
ENTIRE 2 HR VIDEO: 9/11 Blueprint for Truth presented by Architect Richard Gage, AIA
9/11 Blueprint for Truth: The Architecture of Destruction Commercial architect Richard Gage (founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth) presents a watertight case for controlled demolition of the three steel-building collapses at the World Trade Center, New York on 9/11/01.
Includes physicist Steven Jones' updated evidence of thermite. Gage's website, www.ae911truth.org, is rapidly drawing building and engineering professionals to the 9/11 movement.
Corporate media continues to down play the truth ... in fact they claim people are mentally ill if they don't believe the government ... yeah ... right ...what is unfortunate for them ... only the bushwhackes believe them.
US News and World Report 911 hit piece backfires against the Propagandists
U.S. News and World Report ran an article on May 26th entitled“The Inner Worlds of Conspiracy Believers”. The intention was to demonize the truth/freedom movement by implying that anyone who doesn’t believe the official story of 911 or anyone who mistrusts the government all-together is mentally ill. But the real story isn’t the obvious moronic drivel concocted by this yellow-journalistic rag of disinformation, it is the collection of well-informed comments left on their site…. 147 so far, the overwhelming majority of which are critical of the official conspiracy theory and also of this collection of nonsense that tries to pass itself off as news.
Check it ... these are a few questions for the bushwhacked that believe the government's bullshit story about 911 ... since we are nuts then you shouldn't have any problems answering a few questions that concerns most of us so call nuts and tin foil hat peps ...
9/11 - The Basic Questions
1. Why didn't jets intercept the airliners since they had numerous warnings of terrorist attacks?
2. Why did Ashcroft stop flying commercial airlines, citing an unidentified "threat" in July 2001?
3. Why did FEMA lie about their presence in New York on 9/11?
4. Why didn't the Secret Service hustle Dubya out of the classroom?
5. Why did George H.W. Bush meet bin Laden's brother on 9/11?
6. Why did passengers or crewmembers on three of the flights all use the term boxcutters?
7. Where are the flight recorders?
8. Why were the FISA warrants discontinued?
9. How did Bush see the first plane crash on live camera?
10 Why was security meeting scheduled for 9/11 cancelled by WTC management on 9/10?
11. How did they come up with the "culprits" so quickly?
12. How did they find the terrorist's cars at the airports so quickly?
13. Why did Shrub dissolve the Bin Laden Task Force?
14. Why the strange pattern of debris from Flight 93?
15. How extensive was the relationship between the Taliban, the ISI and the CIA?
16. What exactly was the role of Henry Kissinger at UNOCAL?
17. When was it decided to cancel building a pipeline from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan?
18. Why did the FBI in 1996 close the files to investigate Osama bin Laden's relatives in Washington?
19. Why did .Bush stop inquiries into terrorist connections of the Bin Laden family in early 2001?
20. Who made the decision to have John O'Neill stop investigating Al-qeada accounts?
21. Who gave the decision to give him a security job at the World Trade Center?
22. Did John O'Neill meet anyone of the FEMA in the night of September 10th?
23. What about media reports that hijackers bought tickets for flights scheduled after Sept. 11?
24. Why did none of the 19 hijackers appear on the passenger lists?
25. Why would devout Muslims frequent bars, drink alcoholic beverages and leave their bibles?
26. Why would the hijackers use credit cards and allow drivers licenses with photos to be Xeroxed?
27. Why did the hijackers force passengers to call relatives?
28. How did the hijackers change the flight plan without law enforcement or the military try to stop them?
29. How did a hijackers passport miraculously appear near the WTC? Who found it and what time?
30. How could the FBI distinguish between "regular" Muslims and hijacker Muslims on those flights?
31. Why was there not one "innocent" Muslim on board any of these flights?
32. Did someone go through the passenger lists looking for Muslim names and label them as hijackers?
And there are plenty more questions ... about 300 ... where these came from ... you can focus on the ones in bold first ... then the others ... then you can try to dispute Mr. Gage ... but somehow I doubt I will get much response other than the standard "I'm a nut job" it easier for you to do that than dispute the obvious evidence. Watch ... and listen folks ... nothing but crickets ... 

|