Quote:
Originally Posted by FLoJo
if true i would most certainly not call it honorable.. i would view it as more of an attempt to help her political image and not seen as a bad mother who cant instill moral values in their children.. she uses the autistic baby as like a symbol of what a great a great person she is somewhat like what mccain does with his disabled child who he doesnt even parent.. if she was truly an honorable person she wouldnt care what the press said about he daughter and be truthful and accepting about the situation...
im sorry but it seems to me that you guys would praise the fact that she lied, if in fact it was true, and make her to be some kind of martyr or am i understanding incorrectly? i dont think there is a place for lying in politics especially when they will be having authority over us and our nation..
again this is totally speculation and no evidence has been shown to support these claims... interesting conversation either way
|
And you seem willing to accept it in spite of the fact you repeat that it may not be true.
If true, an example of a family relying on itself rather than looking to the government. This would make her more approachable because it is a story many Americans have seen personally.
If untrue. A lie meant to discredit her.
A lie. Bill Clinton lied about an affair with an employee. Hillary Clinton lied about missing FBI files. Obama lied about accepting Federal Election Funding. John Edwards lied about being a baby daddy. Joe Biden lied when he plagarized the words of another and claimed them as his own. Democrats appear to love liars.